Town of Charlotte
Board of Selectboardmen
Minutes
Monday, June 23August 25,
2003
67:00 :30 PM, Charlotte Town Hall
MEMBERS PRESENT: Ellie RussellCharles
Russell, Chair
Jennifer
Cole
EllieCharles Russell
Paul
Arthaud
Debbie
Ramsdell
OTHERS: Dan Senecal-Albrecht (selectboard assistant)
Stephen
Brooks
Peter
Coleman
Dana Farley
Marty
Illick
Sylvia
Sprigg
Martha
Perkins
Tony
Stout
Jake
Callery
Sylvia
Stephen
Brooks
Sheila
Braun
Marshall
The items on the agenda were as follows:
Approve Minutes for August 11Highway access permits: Applicants- 1. Estate of Marietta Palmer, 2. Alma T. Clark June
29, 1995 Revocable Trust, 3.
Champlain Valley Cohousing Development Company, LLC. / Public Discussion / Approve Conservation
Fund Expenditure for Knowles Farm PreservationAdjustments
to Agenda / Public
Discussion/ Appointments (member & alternate) to CCMPO-TAC/ Approve
appointment of Zoning Administrator, Tom Mansfield, as recommended by Planning
Commission / Peter Keating, Executive Director, CCMPO: Report to Town of Charlotte / Adjustments to
FY04 Town Budget / Parking issues at Old Brick Store
(Michael Frost) / Report by Clark Hinsdale, III on proposed new barn at
Nordic Farm / Presentation of Recommendation by Rec. Cmsn. On Town Intramural
Program / Open Bids for Brushhogging of certain Town lands / Approve permit
request by Waitsfield Telecom to repair utility pole on Thompsons’ Pt. Rd./
Potential acquisition of Varney Farm by Town / Appointemtsn to Town
Trails Committee / Approve
minutes of May 12th, May 20th, June 9th and June
11thLewis
Creek Association Grant Proposal / Varney
Farm: Update and
Decision on conceptual Purchase and Sales agreement / Appoint new Selectboard
member to serve in Ms. Ramsdell’s place until the next town meeting / Selectboard
Updates / Adjournment
Highway access permits
Estate of Mariette Palmer – Erick Farrell,
respeting
the estate asddressed the meeting. Cmikgn off existing cut and proposeing to sweep it
– curfren road serves existing house – Jauily 2nd going in fron tof CPC. Road commissioner
has been there already in answer to Ellie’s question if he had been on site
yet. He had no problems. Chrales askedf or culvert. Ther eis a culvert – enterie road needs to
be upgraded, Eric said. 18 foot wide
road in twon spec, but Dan suggested at intersection it may be wider than
that. Planenrs will determine that. Ellie said usually see peole after planning, but she sees no problem with it. 7 lots.
Planloloks good to Selectboard.
Come bafckd after preliminary. Charles asked for comments by
neighbors. Tehre were none. No big objection now.
Alma T. Clark – Tony Stout addressed the PC. He showed wehere site was on ortho map. Plan is to have driveway be at top of long grade
that goes down Spear St. eextension. Scrfeening on ____ he asked for a low screening,
Mr. Claflin asked for. Charles said
that is a planning commission item. Dan asked if PC had reocjmmmendaiton on curb
cut. Yes, this is final approved. Tony will talk with Jean to see if she
would put screening in, but up to purchaser of lot. Dan asked for dcomments relative to the driveway.
Charles asked
for application from Junior of Dan. Site distance 550 fee to the north and 1300 fee t oithe south
– it has been
flaggedk Dan
read from the appolicationl.
Champlai Vallye cohousing – Dave Marshall from CEA showed map of location of
project. Locvasytred
between Mr. Larwane’c epondand Doug Cole’s place. Aploication creates new curb cut. Serve 26 units – had sketpch plan and prleiniahnry plat approval
form lpaning ocmmisons – appolicatoin in for ifinal approval to CPC. CVCH
formalize enrance with paving, no curb.
Ellie asked if any culver t- Dave said no culver tnecessary there. Sitge
distandces in nrotherlyd ireciton 510 rfeetk, southerly 1230 feet. AOT
recommendatdiokns site
distances – road posted at 35 but could
use additional signs, but wen tup to 40
and 45, at 45 mph, dite sitancde
is 495 feet. Can get 550
feet of distance if cut some vegetation in front of Mr. Lawrence’ slot. He
recomjmends that. Buildign drifveway
in another otwn’s right of way, Charles noted. Dan asked for
reposnbiloityh of mowing – it would be the applicatnt’s responsibilty, Dave
Marshall said.
Charles asked for concerns of neighborfs. There were none.
7:20 – regular meeting – Charles called to order.
Adjustments to Agenda
None. Syhlvia ____ raise
questions about issues listed at the end – can we
raise issues during the public disucssiojhn comment and subjmit at that point
about VELCO? Charles said you can brin it up briefly then or leave
something that can read later. Move to
close hearing on 2 driveway acdcess request (Clark and COHOUSIGN – Elloie, Jenn
second. All in favor.
Public
Discussion
Sylvia Knight, studied VELCO ducments and looked at Charlotte Town plan,
which appears to contain no olanguage about tulitelsi and rights of way inrelation toh et values the Tonw antes to rptoect and belives tha that situation can be
remedied. Next poin – VELCO proejfct must comply with 30 VSA
Section 248 in reard to protedcting pubolic heath, natural resoures and other values covere din town
doucmeetsn and
must show that power needs can not be addressed in any other way. Material from velco do not demonstrate to this point that preojct
won’t cojmply withpreoovisn sof the law – hopikng that Selctboard nad
CPC will work together rto jmaybe amend town plan to include language about
tiltiutelsi and rihts of way and inp
ut from CCC that it beocm ea prat to VELCO petition and maybe set up adhoc
group to help them int eh process. Nothing in comments so far that address the issue of
tocins used
in chemically treated poles.
No recognition of natural communities that CCC has idneified in the town. Some probelmes around economics and lack of
full o regard for alternative measures.
She gave written comments. Ellie
asked if referrihng to chemicallyh treatedw oooden polesl. Yes, Syvloia said.
Chalrfes
asked for nother public disucssino., Stephen
Brooks asked 1) did slectman provide inforjmaiton regaridn his
attendance this evening (Arthaud) – ellie
said back in saddle in July –she ahd emjail form him 2) has Chalroetet
vlUtnerere fire and rescue provided
radft of
corporate bvylaw syet – Ellie
said no – they have been working othem, gone out to membership and haven’t come
back form membership yet – 3) following
up the Ploof Farm road discussion at last kjmeeting,
has town ocucnil been consuldte dgarding wMr.
Belmont’s comments? Charles said
yes. Some of
Beldex’s comments
cmae out of
lease bwetteen shelburen and charlotte and cease to esist when
sale went thorugh. The
lates word from town attorney is that the row that was liad out originally inMay of 65 still exsistgin
addition tohe oradway tha tno exists and right of way was never extinguished. Beldar
Also fences when road was widended to y60 fee tform 50
fee int eh 90s, Charles said, the requirements for fences on both wsides didn’t
go away – so still reuqireimetns for
gates at end of road, but no reuqiremetn to lock or close the gates at any given
time. Is it SB’
intention to sumarmize lalt hese thing sin wriign and if so, when, steve
asked. Ellie said end of summer. Thank kyou very much< Steve said.
CCMPO TAC – appoint
Dan fo r2-year term, Chalres asaid.
Move aponitDan S_A, Elli to 2-year term as our represntaitnve to
tehCCMPO – TAC. Jenifer seconded. All in favor. PASSED. Also, Elli moved to apopinte Debbie Ramsdell
aslatenrate to same orgnaizaiton for eh reuqireiste term. Jenny seconded. All in favor. Passed.
Appoikntgemtn
of Zoning adminsitriator – CPC recolmmedned – Elli moved to approve CPC
apopintmetn. Jenny seconded. All in favo r – PASSEDl.,
PETER
KEDATING – Susan
Smichenko in polace of Peter Kearting. Addresssed th PC – to talk
about 2025 Metropolitan Transporation Plan and give
explanation. Did just
handouts. She gave brief overview of CCMPO –
established by federal law, locally
contgroleld in
1982. Long-range plan, maintain TIP, project scooping,
planning studies and technical assistance.
Plan required by law. Has to be
updated every 5 years. Some new
information is freight study, bike/ped plan, corridor studies,
new population and emloyemtnrpoejctoins, transit studies and palns fo rinteliigent transporatoin
systems. Last
update was in 1997. Exlained
the phases of devleping the plan. Looked at
existing conditions, existing public tarnsporation, rail and bike;ped facilities. Looked at county
travel patterns. Trend analyhsis looked at
population and employemtn preojctiosn devleopd for the county and spreading jobs and households
and relating to traffic and transporation and coming up with a 2025 planl. That was Phase 1. SHE WENT
THROUGH POWER POINT PRESENTATION ATTACHED.
By fall,
have draft plan for Selectboard to read.
Goal is to
have people not use their cars – stgaggared work hours, bike/ped planning, increase
transit, CIRC highway. Trying to
balance money –
interstae aned arterials. Lots of time
in public outreach. Made presentations
to selctobards, workshops. Now
finalizing the preferred latenratigve in tersm of what projects CCMPO wil lbe
recommending. Iiimportant to be in MTP
to secure federal fudnign for them – hope to have draft plan readyh in July
03. Hoe to adopt plan in late 2003. Sylvia Sprig asked what is official line of
CCMPO about Bulringotn’s proposed mujltmodal downtown transit center. Susan said they have always support multijmodal transit
center; belive important component to continuing rowht of
transit in the county. Syhlvia asked the location. Susan had
never heard any ojbectoin to the location – it is near the lake and they are
promjting lalke front devleopmtn; downtown
and accessible – she has heard that bad thing to have near lake cuz
bus stations are bad places. Bulringont
wants to create a nice place near ECHO center, she said. They encourage public transportation. IT is a city of bulrington project. Nancy asked if 1.5 milllin for building and
that’s noneof yoru funds?? Susan said a lto of it is federal funds. Wantg it near the railroad tracksf or the
train, Nancy confirmed with Susan.
Sylv a____ good to have in one placek,m – main disavnatgne is away from
shopping center (Church Street).
Sylvia ___ -concerned about ejmphasis
on highways and very littile emphaspiss on alternative tarnpsort. Susan said
strive for balanced approach and plan does have signaitincint dollars for bike paths, sidewalks. Syhlvia
____ said
weidneign tends to increase speed, she voiced her concern. Susan said
most fcirttical elrmeent was
land use. If sprawl, congestion will
get worse, she said. Sylvai Sprig said January roundtable workshop was a very good acitity. Clark Hindasale asked future of reailroad. Susan said they are
evaluating a number of things (federal transit amdihnsitraiton
– we had gotten al to fomeony for rail and it was costing goto much money) and
there are no immeidat
eplans to start up
again – they said if traffic during congstructoin on
route 7 gets bakck, the=y will consider startin git upagain. Sylvia ____ concern
that VELCO preojct may take its new expanded tarnsmision
line irhgt on top
of rr station so may have tow rk out coorfdination with
that. Syhlvia ____ - said all reprairs mad eon rr for passenger service were jmade on
understanding that service be resumed or continue, so hope that those epxneditgures are
not in vain (the building of the station).
Susan considers passenger rail to be an important ocmponetn of transporatin
system. When Flyer was operatingk, wasn’t
used by enough people – tghey
are also loking at bringing tarisn to Misddlblour; St. Albans. Rfail is imporatn to CCMPO and part aof the
future. Clark asked if bed able
to afford the multmodall. Suean said
City of Burlington rpeojct being paid for by federal dollars. Clarfk asked if it will be
adfforfdable. Susan said doesn’t know
if got any teantn. Nancy asked costs
$15 milino for whole preojct, Susan said.
Ellie surpised that CCMPO Board support CIRC highway from end to end.
Charles aksed about
freight. Susan said athere was
a freight study that looked at oppouirthies for freight in Chitten dCounty
but have recongiezd that it is outdated and freight is very much a
focus riht now – loking to update study next year. What
types of freight, Charles asked. Susan
said ther ei snot an emphasis at this point – certainly
rail is better altanritev, keeps truck soff raod, but it is expensive and they arelooing at. Draft plan
didn’t address that at all, so that was added in January as necessary cojnpoeont. They are talking
about moving rr yard – and now trucks on highway – therea reno warehouses –
it’s all on the road. Nancy asked how
legally can use rrs for service eand storage yards of rr cars? Jeff said part of it is to get a handle on
it for staff. Sylvia ____ if talking about rr, more consideration of more sustainable methods of manaignag weeds
on right of way and less
toxic way and rrs need support of community in order to buy tehcnolgoy and
have personnel to do that work. Susan said ANR
would be helpful for that, but
Sylvai ___ said been down that route.
She just
wanted to put that in in a genarel way. Cloark asked
if CCJMPO fourc eof udnign for trails. Suesan said yes, ChamplainPath comes down
through Charlotte.
Charfles and Susan sked any other questions. There were none.
Charles
Russell, Chair, called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. Ms. Russell said that Clark Hinsdale, III
will be coming in around 8:30 p.m. to give an update on his application.
APPROVE MINUTES FOR AUGUST 11, 2003.
Ms.
Russell moved to approve the minutes of the August 11, 2003 meeting with
corrections noted. Ms. Cole seconded. Corrections
were briefly discussed. Mr. Russell
asked for public comment. There was
none. All were in favor and the
motion was unanimously APPROVED.
Debbie
Ramsdell has a revised job description she wanted to put in the agenda.
Peter
Coleman asked about the survey that the Selectboard recently send out. He noted that he had sent an email about his
objection to it but wanted to state tonight for public record that it was a
terrible map that was used. Mr. Russell
said his feedback is well taken. Mr.
Coleman added that there is still public confusion about where the Burns
property is and who owns it.
Debbie
Ramsdell wanted to discuss some housekeeping issues:
·
Need to appoint a new TAC representative and
alternate due to her absence and Dan Senecal-Albright’s departure.
·
Also she has been informing the Burlington Free
Press when the SB havehas
meetings. She said that the new person
will need the address to continue doing this and she gave it out:: jpeters@bfp.burlingtonfreepress.com
Ms.
Russell reminded the SB that Ms. Ramsdell also represents the SB at the senior
center meetings on the first Thursday of the month. Ms. Russell offered to fill this void on a temporary basis. Ms. Russell has the draft of the senior
center coordinator job description and will circulate it.
Ms.
Russell thanked Debbie Ramsdell for three and a half years of service. She also thanked her for her guidance.
Peter
Coleman asked if the Selectboard put up approved minutes on the web site. Mr.
Russell said that they hope to put them up, as well as draft minutes, when they
get a new assistant.
Mr.
Russell asked Peter Coleman about the Old Lantern application. The town is an abutting neighbor of the
property and they received notification of the application. Mr. Coleman said that when the original
property was subdivided, the Old Lantern was previously 5.1 acres and as it
ended up, the farmhouse got the leftover land (9.53 acres). They are proposing to sell the farmhouse and
want to move 4.52 acres. The farmhouse
property wraps around The Old Lantern presently; the current 9.53 acres would
decrease to 5.02 acres for the farmhouse and the Old Lantern would be 9.53
acres. He explained it is just putting
more of the land with the Old Lantern.
He further said that a bed and breakfast could be built on this property
as long as it is pertinentappurtenant to the Old Lanternas long as
there is an operating pertinence to the Old Lantern. This subdivision modification is proposed to be discussed at the September 4, 2003 Planning Commission meeting. Ms. Russell said she could not be present at
that meeting. The Selectboard agreed
that they had no opposition to this proposed modification.
VELCO
At this
time, Ms. Russell asked Ms. Cole about the hearing schedule for the VELCO
transmission line matter. Ms. Cole said there is
a September 30 public hearing at the
Charlotte Town Hall. Others
scheduled are September 4 in Barre and September 29 in Brandon. This information is advertised in The Charlotte News. Party status groups are the Potash Water
Shed, ISO New England, VPIRG and Conservation Law Foundation. AIV has moved to intervene as well, Ms. Cole
reported. The VELCO Committee
is trying to schedule another site visit with VELCO and
should be hearing on some details
soon. She said
that the VELCO Committee has not met since early August. Mr. Russell asked
how this site visit will
differ from the previous one; Ms.
Cole responded by saying it would be in a different location.
Martha
Perkins asked Ms. Cole about the situation as well and the
status. Ms. Cole said she
thinks there is a lot of information and a lot of process to go through. They were interested in changing the design
and there were things they were interested in
looking into which would benefit
both parties. She said they have been good to work
with. The changes would be around The
Waldorf School and it would benefit all three parties and VELCO is also willing
to move the substation to the other side of the road. Ms.
Perkins asked if Ms. Cole
had seen the design of
the
poles. Ms. Cole said she would find illustrations in
the book for her and said that they are single poles and
lines come off one above the other and some of the poles are 70 feet tall in
areas where there are distribution
lines but most are 61 feet tall but they might
consider making them shorter than that.
There are 3 lines on the pole.
There is a 50 foot50-foot right-of-way on each
side. Ms. Cole
showed Ms. Perkins pictures in the VELCO book.
Peter
Coleman asked what the suggested changes were and Ms. Cole said
that they have worked on different issues and located areas where there
were problems or concerns, like FortThorpe Brook
area – what would be the most suitable types
of poles there. Also use
of treated wooden poles is a concern.
There was a suggestion made, she said, that
lower poles could be used and VELCO said
they might do that – VELCO said
maybe 52-foot poles in some locations, but more and closer
together. Ms. Cole
also said that VELCO will be looking into underground lines near The Waldorf
School. They are aware that in the town plan
it
references that the Town prefers that power or transmission lines
are put underground but it also says
to use existing routes. Steven Brooks
asked if the committee has a
position about whether the line should be buried or not. Ms. Cole said
that feeling is that it would be good if they can be put
underground, except in some areas. She also said that the
committee hasn’t
taken a position yet, but rather their
role has been to gather information and inform VELCO about
concerns and the philosophy
of the Town. Mr. Russell
asked if the cost of burying the line had been looked
into. Ms. Cole said that they are doing
that. Mr. Brooks
asked if the committee would take a
position and Ms. Cole said
that the committee will need more discussions but thinks that
there are some areas where they make a stronger
case than others for putting it underground
and there are others where it might be better to
have aboveground (like wetlands).
She said that there are areas where the
committee can make a recommendation but this issue is one
that for some areas it will be
more for public good to have the line underground but
not through the whole
town.
Dana Farley
asked if there are any criteria on which VELCO or the towns
base the decision on whether a line should be
underground, e.g. health, environment, visual, etc. Ms. Cole said she
doesn’t know because it seems like expense is a big thing and health issues can
be argued either way and where they were put
underground it was more to protect the view but
also protect property values or development
potential of an area. In a place out of
state, where some lines were put near a golf course, it was more for the visual
impact or impact on development than health issues. Waldorf School is one where it is an issue
of potential development AND
health because lines would be so close.
Ms. Farley asked if
VELCO had
guidelines in their regulations as to what they consider when
they decide to underground or not.
Mr. Russell said that these kinds of questions should be asked
at the next VELCO meeting. Ms. Cole said that the next site visit
will be along the tracks north on Greenbush Road. The site visit
with VELCO will be within the next couple
of weeks. Ms. Cole
said that the next meeting will be posted.
Ms. Perkins wanted to remind people that public hearings are just for
input so it would be good to have a meeting ahead of time to ask questions.
KNOWLES FARM
Michael Hardy, representing Charlotte Land Trust, came
before the meeting. He said
that there has been an application to conserve the farm and the applicants are
looking for $10,000 from the Conservation Fund with a
total cost of $387,000. The Committee
will raise $5,000 and $5,000 will come out of Charlotte Land Trust’s own
fund. The real value to the Town, he said,
is
to conserve because 1) the Town would get an easement along Ferry Road which would be a valuable connectorRoad, which would be a
valuable connector, and 2) in terms of view, one way
to access the Town of Charlotte
is from the ferry and that’s the first farm that visitors
see.
When
asked about the money, he said
that $5,000 was coming from the
Charlotte Land Trust budget, not the line
item in the Town budget. He said that $5,000
already has been raised
from Charlotte Land Trust and an
additional $5,000 from the neighborhood has been raised and they are asking for
$10,000 from the Conservation Fund. Ms. Russell said it
has been approved by all 3 (Recreation, Conservation
and Conservation Fund Advisory Committee). They had a
meeting to discuss this a
few weeks ago. Mr. Hardy said
both Recreation and Conservation
unanimously approved
this. Mr.
Arthaud asked that Mr. Hardy’s handwritten note stating so be typed out and
given to the Selectboard for the record.
Ms.
Russell made a motion to approve the $10,000 from the Conservation Fund for the
preservation of the Knowles Farm. Ms.
Ramsdell seconded. There was
no discussion or input from the public.
Three (3 ayes) Selectboard
members
were
in favor and two (2 abstains) members
abstained (P.
Arthaud and D.
Ramsdell).
LEWIS CREEK ASSOCIATION
Marty
Illick addressed the meeting. She
reported that she has already been talking with the Planning
Commission about the municipal planning grant idea and she is sharing it with
the Selectboard because they would be signing the application.
She
explained that there are two applications you can use (consortia which
is by more than one town and a single town application). They plan on doing the single town option,
which would be simpler. $15,000
is the cap for one municipality and
$25,000 is the consortia cap. Mr. Russell asked her to describe what it was and she passed
out a description to Selectboard
members. The concept is to
map impervious/hard surfaces in the Town to in order
to plan for stormwater management. Anything above 9% for hard
surface is degrading the stream so if a town is
not compensating for land use pattern, they are in deep
trouble, she said. Mr.
Russell asked what the
percentage was for Charlotte and she answered that it is at 3.4%, which
includes a little piece of Monkton and a
little piece of Hinesburg. Martha Perkins said that
one thing to do would be to recommend
dirt driveways instead of paved, she offered. Ms. Illick further explained that when calculations
are performed, there are formulas that are used and proven what constitutes
hard and degrees of hard. Based on the recent
analysis of percent
imperviousness conducted by Lewis Creek Associates last
year, “a portion of the Lewis Creek
watershed … is 3.4%…” she read
from the report. Ms. Cole asked for the
definition of impervious used here. Ms.
Illick said that it was the a mountn of surface that was hard
beyond what would be a natural land cover (such as a forest or
grassland field whether water can get into the ground). This
includes rooftops. Ms.
Perkins asked if, when water goes onto a rooftop and comes off, there was
contamination. Ms. Illick said yes and
it depends on the roof. Ms. Russell asked if imperviousness of soil differs from sand
and clay? Ms.
Illick said yes. Dana
Farley asked if this kind of request is a requirement of the state regulations or federal regulations on
stormwater discharges?
Are all towns having to do this, she further asked. Ms. Illick
said yes if you are in a cap for needing a stormwater permit.
Ms. Farley asked if Charlotte was
not one of those towns,
would it want to do it anyway? Ms. Illick said yes to
be ahead of the game. The State has a
threshold of one acre now when you need to get a
stormwater discharge permit, so if
greater than one acre, you need to go to the state to figure things out in
terms of drainage. Ms. Russell
asked what this grant seeks to do. Ms.
Illick said the grant is
wanting to map the percent imperviousness in whole town of Charlotte. She said they would
like to merge it with build-out data against the settlement
pattern. Mr. Russell asked if
it will get updated as things get developed. Ms. Illick said they would
have to talk about what the interval would be in terms of updating. Dean Bloch
is supportive of this and Greg Brown in Chittenden County is supportive
of this. They are trying to link together buildoutbuild out and percent imperviousness data. Ms. Russell asked if there was a
downside. Ms. Illick said the challenge
is to do it in way where the results can get the Town to
something useful. Steven Brooks asked
if there was any need
not to make a motion to
support her application. Ms.
Russell asked who did the work. Ms. Illick said that the work is done by Kristin
Underwood and Chris Davis. She said that Planning willwould get the
benefit of more data whichdata, which they
will have to learn how to use.
Ms.
Ramsdell made a motion to approve the study of increased percent imperviousness
in the Town and its implication for stormwaterstorm water
management. Mr. Arthaud seconded. Ms. Illick said
there are 2 pages that the Town needs to fill out and Lewis
Creek will do all
the rest. All were
in favor and the motion was APPROVED.
VARNEY FARM
Mr. Russell said the Town
has been given another month
to work on this issue and respond back to the Demeter Fund
(deadline is October 1, 2003). Ms.
Farley said that the
Demeter Fund recognizes that the Town needs
more time to do feasibility work and feasibility work
includes water, septic and traffic and the legal aspects of the
density if used for affordable housing units.
Overall, the Demeter Fund wants to communicate to the
Town to not panic; they recognize that the Town is
moving forward in good faith and needs more time to figure out some of these
issues. Ellie Russell and Mr.
Russell met with the sustainable agriculture people at the UVM Extension
Service at the
Varney premises. They walked
around the house and barns and they were
very
serious about using the house for office space and possibly the barns
for farming. They’re very interested and
they met today the 3 parties (Center
for Sustainable Agriculture at UVM, Vermont Fresh Network, NOFA
(Northeast Organic Farming Association of Vermont) and
Intervale Foundation). They all need to get approval from their
boards and they will get back to the Town in preparation for the September 15
Selectboard meeting. Ms. Russell
said she willwould continue
her due diligence for the
Selectboard on the issues.
It is important
for a qualified traffic engineer to determine what are
safe levels of traffic turning in and out of the property
in
various times of the day.
Charles Russell also
talked with Tim Hustis about density issues and how they might be
solved. Ms.
Russell said the Town’s legal representative and Vermont Land Trust are
searching for ways that might achieve enough density on the Varney property to
allow for affordable housing. Steven Brooks asked
about commercial use – office use. Ms.
Russell said they are
all nonprofits, so commercial use is not an issue. non profit
so not commercial use. Mr. Arthaud asked if the Town could use traffic studies that they already have in their
possession. Mr. Brooks offered to give
the name and phone number to the Selectboard of an engineer at the Agency of
Transportation whose only job is maintaining the traffic
formats and counters and she’ll send a map on where the counts are, etc.
Peter Coleman said that
there are extensive surveys of the Berry Farm property that have been
done. Ms. Farley said that a project cannot be denied
because of traffic (under Act 250) and there is always some way to mitigate an
adverse traffic impact; the issue is who is willing to pay for it. Ms. Russell said that a
traffic study would have to be based on a potential
use.
Ms.
Illick said that when the park was
put together and all dollars were spent,
there was a large
amount of money put into an equestrian loop on top of the hill and
it is not realized because it is just a piece ofpiece of a larger
picture that hasn’t been realized so fully support any
work helping to realize that past investment that Steven
Rockefeller has already made and regionally
there are equestrian trails,
Shelburne Farms, and
so much potential in that area to be an equestrian center. She said
that it is important to keep this past vision in mind. Ms.
Russell said that she and Charles Russell discussed that today with the group
and that it is part of the future there. Ms. Farley suggested
checking the traffic impact if conditions stayed the same
(capacity).
Debbie Ramsdell left the
Selectboard table.
Paul Arthaud made a motion to go into Executive
Session to discuss the appointment of a new Selectboard member. Ms. Russell seconded. All were in favor and the motion was APPROVED. The Selectboard went into Executive Session
at 8:21 p.m.
Paul
Arthaud made a motion to come out of Executive Session. Ms. Russell seconded. All were in favor and the motion was
APPROVED. The Selectboard came out of
Executive Session at 8:40 p.m.
Ms. Cole moved to
appoint Francis J. Thornton as
fill–in Selectboard member until March 2004. Mr.
Arthaud seconded. There was
no discussion. FourThree
Selectboard members were in favor and one objected (E. Russell). (43 ayes and
1 nay). Debbie Ramsdell abstained.
Mr.
Russell went back to the VELCO discussion. Ms. Cole said the VELCO
Committee has not taken a stand and that
there will be more information gathering and
discussion. They will
bring
back anything that the Selectboard talks about. Mr. Russell said that
if the committee finds research about burying
the lines, it would
be valuable for the
Selectboard to hear recommendations; independent analysis of what
it would cost to bury them, etc. for logical areas (where town
plan had identified scenic
corridors at least). Mr.
Brooks asked if it was
a foregone conclusion then that the lines should not be buried in the wetlands
and if so what is the qualified basis. Mr. Russell said it is only based on what
Sylvia Knight said about not wanting to disturb the wetlands to bury them. Ms.
Cole said the committee
needs to gather more information. VELCO documents talk about the impact on
wetlands and the impact of putting them underground in
wetlands. Mr.
Brooks said that if ideally the line is
buried, then why doesn’t the discussion take off from the
point of that point of view (why shouldn’t the
line be buried, because the Town Plan
says lines should be buried. Ms. Cole said for him to
look at the article that she gave him earlier (information on
underground lines off the website) from the
Public Service Board from Wisconsin
- talking about different ways to put lines underground). Mr. Coleman asked who the
VELCO Committee members were – Ms. Cole said they were Linda Radimer from
Planning, Eric Finely from Conservation and herself.
Mr.
Brooks asked about any new legal matters.
Mr. Russell said that the Town is being sued by Steven Brooks.
Mr.
Arthaud made a motion to adjourn. Ms.
Russell seconded. All were in favor and
the motion was APPROVED
Meeting
adjourned at 8:50 p.m.
O:\Selectboard minutes\2003\aug25.docBudget Adjjustmetns
Due to motion passed at town meeting,
looking to reduce $34,0p00
from budget, Charles
said ($33,906). Ellie said this is a
propsal only. Suggest that cut 2%from
senior center ($800), she went down the list.
Chalres elpxaiend the $15,000 from listers – state gives extra money for
administering that. Sylvai __ -asked why cuts are nexesarry. Town voted to lower budget at town meeting,
Ellie said. Chalres asked for
motion. Ellie move that we adjust the
budget as just indicatged. Jennifer
seconded. Stephen Broooksasked what, of
any of the nine deaptmental areas, do anyh of them
have income or revenue sourceds other than appropriations
form the taxpayers? The firs t3 do and the berry farm does, the
library. – so yes, Chalres said a good portion does. Jujniro said highway gets grants usually every year. Stevephn
asked grant sitguation regards roads presently. Junior said got $35,000
in grants for the coming year. Stephen said seniors can raise funds int eh ocmmunitiy and it
seem slike be reasonable to expect thej mto do
more fundraising and Fire
& Rescue wonder what’s ocme into the secret special fund so far this yedar
and all they provided at budget tije for
discusiosn was preoivus year’s beignignand ending blanace and then can Fire & Rsecue to danya
fudnrfaing:? Ellie said talked to hem abou tthose
things – one reason didn’t cut more is some real concern abou tstaffing that town may have
to support for rescue – cut their reuests ocndciedrably, Ellie said. Stephen said also that Fire
& Resuce beqaeuwsted $1jmillino that get
income off from forever and that is according to public records. Probate is almost finished so check s will
stat ocmign soon. Elli agreed,
but at the tiem we did this, still
not final thing and view budget as living document. Charles said in cas eof highways, if there is really $20,000 more in
grants, and cutting
$85,00 it won’t impact greatly. Charles said if Charlotet Land Trust iddn’t use their full $9,650 hnext yaer, that
lefet over
could be used to fill in Berry Farm or Library. Nancy asked when berry farm came
in for that, they made I clear that they wree ogin got fundraise and this si the
maximum the y eneeded. Have they
come back in or has anybody checked
tgo see hoe much
money they have raised to amintainteh
their project? Ellie said, not
but they have bigger cut than anybody else.
Allin favor of motin for custs.
APPROGVED.
Parking ISSUES at Old Brick Store
Michael
and Karne Frost,
neighbors of BrickSTore, - ask Town to make decisions about aprking in
front of house. Become
serious issue of how people park, Michael
said – people park randomonly and not out of the flow of traffic. Issueds
are erosion; many leagve cars running and diesel
fume comes into house (Health
hazard cuz its’ on a dialy basis) Ask perfmission or to in a way possibly
eliiante parking in front of thei rhouse in such a way – Karen shoed
photos. Parking isn’t really estalibshed there. Concner is danger cuz of kids in town that
bike down the street. Seroius safety
issue and concerned about liabiloity, hapahzed parking related issues. Edllike
asked if tried signs. Micahel said
no. Karen said that unless something
that prevents them, it won’t work. Micahel suggests afer metin gwith Jujnior
to try a curb that could be pladced there that would take site lien of het raod
and conitnue it up straight and mad eout of a
temporary type of curbing and they wiould fill in and dirt. They are not 100\% set on knowing andswer – looking
to get a buffer on their frontdoor. Michael talked
with store owners and said not wanting to creat ea problem – just want parking – they undrefstand store
needs parking. ____ from
store said at the crunch hour, there isn’t enough room. They dohn’t even park around the store. Karen said volujme is different and size of trucks is considrealbey
more. ___om store said nobody does the 25 mph. Charles asked how majhny aprkgin spots lose
if do the curb thing. 2 parking
spots would be lost. Karen said give them the
alleyway. Junir said otpoinwould be to paint some
lines and have no parking painted there.
___ folrm
store said no one would take any notice of it. Michael said that
if people angle park along then gget more parking. Jujjhior said not enough room there. Junior
said just put lines
in front of their house. Ellie suggested
putting a planter there to detour.
Stephen Broks said what
is the I jmpact if create a barrier – what is the precedent that you create and
then also in doing that what new liability
exposures does the mucjhnipality have to face because of creatihg that new other ? Dcharles said no libality –soergein imjmunity because it is
in town right of way. Charles said low
curbing good. Issue to this is that town has
on 2w separate
ocations
hired LA to get a
fix – there
are some plans somewhere in the town offices –Julie Campoli did one – there is
federal grant money out there – issues
were robertgs farm vehicles that iddnt’[ ijpede accedss for and some concedrns
about suburbaniation (didn’t want ot look like Shelburen), so she think sit
would be great charge to CPC and Slectobard to ask them to revisit the idea nd
staff to hutn down funding (Dana Farley).
Karen said they have patienatoly waited
and problem has gotten worse. Solution
could be temporary and moveable. Micahel said
they are wiling to pay for it. Chalres askedffor Rlpho’s
impression of curb idea. No rpboem with it he said. SB in favor of tyhring cur bidea out. Jenny
wants to hutn up old plans. Chlres said
Junir supervise this preojct. SB
charged Juniro to put in some kind of temporary curbin with Frosts to the point
where Frosts hosue ends ot het west. John Hammer asked who payhign – the Frosts are
paying.
CLARK
HINSDALE III and CLARK HINSDALE JR approached the SB to talk about barn
stariting to building oNordic Farm.
CH III give brief update on
how things are prorfgtessng. Manure pit
appeale ddto Supreme Court and that is not reovled yet, so over
winter plans
have been to look at putting milking fialcity at Nordic and end result of anlayssis is a
buidig that will milk 280 cows. New
technology – milking cows with robots – cows go
when readyk, not on a set schedule. Also, working with Dept of Ag on a methane digester that would create elecricty out of
methane generated by themanure and that has side enefit – cuz that what causes
odor. Decision
to addon to barn – barn is icon – so footgprint and aspect and look of it won’t
be hcanged- needs to be reroofed and renovate into facility for heffersl. It is beign
designed to education and ag tourism int eh future, not just milking. Facility doesn’t use entire land base and hope that
can idnetifyh oung
farmers that might want ot utilize existing barns when vacated in faor of Nordic barn. Showed 2 exhibits which showed layoutProposd
to building newfaicality sqauarely ehind existing uildlings. – (New barn behind exising barn in other
words). Brining feed in to facility –
very earsy to turhn riht with truck ihnto farmk ut hard to leave with a
truck. So plan to improve road along the pasture meadow
fence and bea ble to go to Lije Kilna dn abdk to Mt.
Philo Road. Not near rec path.
Comosting reduces need for manure pit by half. The proosd (250 x 150) new barn. Charlies asked roof line - ridge runs paralle with exising ridge line
– typical square irhgrta ngel farm lijne, III said. Visibility
– III said best view of new
facility is going to be when stop on stop sing going on old Route 7.
Sylvia asked if vegetationalong fence line on either side of Pizagalli
line. III said no gap in vegetation – ther is
Pizagglis’ woods
and driveway tgreses and jmaples along Route 7 but fence line frojm Rte 7 to
woods is open. III will
begin to develop concept sand plans and come back and visti more
about that. Showed map that barn is divided into 4
quadrants. Robots live in area where cows are (this is new barn). Robt
company has indatleld 1800
robots in 25 countires and most are single installoations. No particularbenefit of size – you need
1 robot for eery 70 cows. Ellie asked if
cows went outside –no not
with this sytem. III said though to
raise good quality cows, outside is a very important compoentn. If given a
choise, preer not to go outside when they arfe full. IN the 9mos
cycles, they will be in the barn.
There are open sides and frans for ventilaitoin. Maternityh pen
angled off in back corfner for calving cows. Move from
facility to facility without trucking them.
Dana asked
about nutrient jmanagmeent plan. III said same
protocols as before –p still tesing eery fieldk, esetalibsign a rate of application. T\wo
cohise expor manure back to valley or to compost it because amt of manure
produced her somewhate larger. Thankfor
trail eastmetn – Hindales asigend taril easement which is finalized.
REC COMMISSION
Robin Reade addressed the PC, as well
as Ellen ____. Robin sadi given prior recommendations abou
tprogram. Tonight – more speifci thing
–oted that slary
should be
”$1,500
per sport for total OF $4,500 PER
YEAR.. That jmoney cojes out of budget and moenbhyhf or
euiqapmetn and things be in fee – also voted to charge $30 per kid for soccer – set
fes only for soccer. $60 per fajiliy. Fee includes t-shirts. Also voted
that should expand addretisng beyhond charlottee news because just in case somje good applicants are people that don’t look at – so go in Burlignton Free Press they would like
and/or Seven Days. Deadline for application sto bei n by July 1wstk, Robin set it. Final
jmotion was that 3 reps from rec be aviable fo rhiring ocmittee, Bernie Balen,
EleN Rusllea nd Jessy Bradley are 3 volounteers. Had a
request that need to go to school board or sometboydh from SB go to school
board – need equipment inenveotry so have all sprots eqauipoemtn alviabale for
intramural rpogram from CCS. Secure safe storage for sporst equipemtn because
sometimes gets in Quonest Hut and gets damaged.
Ellie
askd aboutfunding – most is in salaries.
Presonpaid per sport, like a stipend.
Jenny asked what sport – soccer, basketball, lacrosse, Robin answered. Ellie will put
Ellen’s job descirpoitin in town forma tthis week. Chalres askae dabout amitneanne of fileds; upgrade
fields. Robin said come in future. Ellie asked who make dontact with
shocol. Robin suggested SB make contact
with school board about reqauest to get equipoejmtn inveontry and talk abou
tsafe sstorage and ocnfifmirtn numbers of those involved. SB direted
Dan to work on how paying new position, stipend, town employee?
OPEN BIDS FOR BRUSHHOGGING
Dan said two bids
submitte idnt imely maner verifying that they are sealed. First bid from Kurt Fischer – Dan opened it
– he read bid aloud – $3,300
Second bid from Robert Mack, Jr. - $1550,050 and
foiur refences.
Ellie move to accept Robert bill
and Jenny seconded as descirfb ein the bid fro $1,550 for
brushhonggin as appeared in an aanoucnemtn dated May 27
announcement. All in favor – PASSED.
WAITSIFELD TELEDCOM Dan read in to the record –
peitiotn of Waitfield Teelconm.
Elli
moved to approve 0Jenny seconded. All
in fovar – APPROVE.
POTENTIAL ACUWISITION FO VANRY FRAM BY TOWN
Offered it to town for $1 the Varney Farm. Ellie got responses on this subject – 100%
felt should accept offer to acquire fram for $1 – BIGGER QUESTION WAS WHAT DSHOULD
DO WITH IT – ONE PERSON FELT THAT SHOJLUD NTO KEEP IT IN TEHL ONG RUN – SEERL
PEOLE HTOUGHT should keep it and condisedr moving eth building – discussion
about possible uses including equestraincetner, business center, contihneu to
rent it (but some thought town shodjnt’j bbe lalnldrdos) – apoitn a comjmittee
to disucss uues, lok for garnts for upkeepk, determine cost of town to amitnain
ti, affordable housing, need to find out resrcitions (Dana reprsertning meter
fund int his case) – no pressure on us to decide any time soon. David wants memorandu mof understanding,
though. Dana said need to read conservation
easetmetn first to see about afforfdalbe housing – Davdi sen d conservation easement to her in
the meantinme – he will – site visit needs to be shceudled this week. House has y6 bedrooms,k not being rented by
3 idnivdiuals – been apinted inerior and exterior, wriging been redone. Barn needs roof. Reaonslbe to pursue ths, Ellis said, but need study to explore
all possobiile ramifications of the optential uses. We can make agreement without having
decision on use. Stephen has offered
an unspeicfia mnoutn of moneyh to et a ptoentai lpreojct off the ground, Dana
said. When Dand raise dthat issue with
Davis, that is entirely put oth e town to propose. Dana said another point future mainjteancne of the park at or
near standards wto which Stephen estalibshed is a facto rin MOU. Davdi sadi $30,000 a year
would be reqruied for burshohngin, landacpingk replacmetn of roof, etc. to
Ellie. Step[en said the owenr of het
proepryt has proposed to sell to the Town foR $1 p is it far to say that the
point SB is at now is to try and figure out whether they would
like to consider tha offer? Yes. Chalres said need to do site visit
first. Stegphehn said if did that and felt afoarlbek would you send owenr
a letter – yes considering it please send a draft agreement. Edllie said yes, something like that. Dana said
Stpehen is looking for a very thoughtful plan with $ attachae to it and teimfarmes
and implemenmtatino. Nancyasked could
it beA plan instead of
options? Danda said stephne is
interested in A plan, not options.
Jenny added to list – acfcess to risidng rials on deetter park, and also
about barnsa nd housek, there is optential for mixed use – and mgith be
incropreod itn athwa ever the use is (affordable housing) – Noonanosuje in
sheubren will have 2 affordal bedhousing units in that hosue with thrift shop
downstairs and that is possible because connected with rpeojftd futher out of
village behind Gecewiz. So shouldn’t’
be smoothing disjmissed (affrodabh housing) might be incoproated what’s going
on in other preopty (maybe Burs property).
Dana suggested writing al etet to Stephen acknowelodging that this
meeting has taken place and a very friendly letter saying could we have an
extension –
theAugsut q1 date
was menteiond and the town culd use more time. Maybe suggest begnning of September. John _____ said logical thing to do is to hagve some sort of a
plan; put down what you intend to do and the process. Dana said Stephen doesn’t want to
encumer the Town, so town could write al tter tomorrow. Stephen Brooks said concern that here’s a
person willing to give the Town something and seems like nice opportunity and
would be unfoutante if opoprutniyu runs scrfage because of lack of ability to
get it toegher. Regardless of how much
tiejm is nessary, big enough h proejcft that the SB could identify imemdialtey
a group of appropriate people hat can make it happen. Ellie said need to bring in extra peple from town. Elli asked if any suggestiosn of people in town
who would be good to let them know now.
Dana –
Peter Richardson and Andy Roderick. Jenny
said Peter might be interested. Dan noted
this is property consistin gof buildings and the key thing is that jayb want to
be cedratin that whatever do might want
to et town vote, set on 4 options, but in end,
mayh want to put to town vote. Danda said
should be fcareful because Stpehn is wrapping up one part of his life and
moving into another and this is par tof it and the town vote thing may take too
long and he’ll throw
uphis hands. Dan thinks feasible in the
nxt coulpe of motnhs to think up 4 options and by Janayury have a vote and
easily relay to Spehn Rodfcfekeller to settle on 3 or 4 otpions – as logn as
he has sense of finality. Charles said could
have tonw vot ein edalry fall as well.
Ellie
thinks need core of people to get together.
Jenny thnks group of peole can look at list. Nancy says that anyh prosal that comes in its very imporatn
to let taxpayer know the cost to the town and the other issue is that charlotte
has been luckiyh with things – does the town have to cdcept this for tehsmelves
or dfcan it be something as radical as a hospitce hospital and an adult day
care center combined; can it be a total non-profit? Charles thinks go for month extensin – on Jly 14
have barnwstorming session in our meeting and come up with 4 ideas, identify
people –
chalres said in public meeting have anyone whoe intested to say ideas , narrow
down to 4, etc. July 14 have it down
to 4 ideas. Dana said invite Jeffrey
Glassberg to come and take look at building and give town some idedas on what is
feasible and what isn’t and take him on the site visit. He’s from
Vergennes. Dana said Stephen’s ]most
ideal outcome to conitneu to grace and respect the integrit and elgance of
original plan and is ocncnred that what ahappens tehr will continue to lok
the way it does today. Charlesasked
for special meeting before July 14 to discus it – proposed
JUEN 30
and worked for everyone. – Juen 30 –
brainstorjming meeting – public thing – posters around town, e.g. Dana recommended SB to send letter to
Sephen telling him what was decided tonight.
Letter will talk about june 30 special meeting. Juen 30
7:00pm
TOWN TRAIL COMMITTEE
Dan said he circulated a list for trail committee
members (potential). Jenny moved to
appoint this adhoc ocmmittee list.
Ellie seconded. APPROVED.
MINTUES
Move June 11 to next meeting
May 12– Move to accept minteus of May 12 – Elli 1, Jenny 2nd. Stephen rooks had
changes. All in favor with Stephen
Brooks’
changes. PASSED
Mayh 20 – jmvoe to approve minteus of May 20 –
Ellie. Jenny seconded. All in favor with changtes as noted. APPROFVED
Juen 9 – Jenny move approve minteus – Elil e2nd –
Stpehn Brooks ahd a minoir change -
approved with changes as noted.
June 11 – postponed
UPDATES
VELCO work – Ellie talked to CPC about VELCO – they
suggested small group (1 person from SB, 1 CCC, 1 CPC) whou would coorfdinate
public input to have full discussion that needs to take place about VELCO. Chalres asked Jenny to be that person. Fine.
Ellie also mentienod that our auditor has notified us that
he is cutting back on workload and wil lnot e serving charlotte in the coming
year, so mayry is in the procedss of calling a couple of other firms to see if
they will take our account and costs, etc.
Also did hedar from state grading comno lelve of appraiser they di dhear us and they increased our
commonwealth of appraisal to 84.6% from 79%.
MOVING O F RR CARS – Dan talkead with rr guy who is
in change of cars and omvign around and he said, ypu that happens at night because cusojrs
call us during the day and say they want cards int eh morning and doesn’t think
it will be happening too much in the nareterm future and Dan said we have no
legal hammer ove ryou, just want yhou to know neighborhsare concerned to try
and call ahead and ehll do the best he could.
THORP BARN
Dan said reuest – dan awrote article to chalrote
new s- garnt getitn daley eunti Janayruy – ackonwelodge work by 10th graders
from Wlakfodr shocol to calen oru basement –
Jenny said dict st. goeg wil lcall and get back to
us to get work done to rpevent vandalism.
PAITNINOF TOWN AHLL
This weekend pressure wash and hope to be here
onmodany or Tuesday. Trevor Mack trail
ben published – advedrisimetn for bid jUne 19 open bids July 10 – awared july
18 – alld one by
Sepberm 18
TOWN PARTY
Next Monday talk about that. JuNE 30 meeting. Make sure SB have display and have rep there from SB.
Sign bills
Jennymoved to agre with letter for cojmpuer appraisal
services with State of VMEornt Deapt of Taxes – Ellie 2wnd. APPROVE
ADJOURNMENT
Ellie move to ajourdn. Jenny 2nd 10:27 p.m.APROVED>